AJP Social Justice Standards

A. Pre-Standards Revision Steps: (December 2008 - March 2009)

1. AJP Team proposes a process and timetable for making major revisions and/or any additional scope to our standards and seeks approval from AJP Advisory Council (AC), and then seeks additional stakeholder input. DEC — Approved by AC
2. AJP Team proposes the draft process and seeks informal feedback from international social and environmental groups (March 2009)
3. AJP Team, in consultation with the Advisory Council (AC), creates a standards revision committee at Dec 08 meeting which is balanced by sector, expertise and ability to serve to review standards and propose revisions based on stakeholder input and AJP pilot experiences. Currently the AJP team is RAFI, CATA, NOFA, QCS/FOG and RENACE.
   For more information on the AJP Standards Committee, indicate your interest in an email to agjusticeproject@gmail.com
4. AJP Team based on these inputs publishes AJP standards revisions process and timeline on our website and sends out notice to our international mailing list. (March 2009)

B. AJP Standards Revision Process and Timeline to be tested with the AC and international stakeholders

1. Overall revisions scope and timeline agreed upon by AJP Advisory Council and international advisors.December-January 09
2. Overall revisions scope and timeline circulated for stakeholder comment. March 09
3. Comments considered and overall revisions scope and timeline published. April 09
4. AJP Team develops Draft Revision based on pilot experience. March-May 2009
5. AJP standards review committee comments on draft and seeks consensus of committee members. June-September 2009
6. Committee Consensus Revision Draft Sent out for comments. October-December 2009
7. Comments Considered. December 09-January 10
8. Second Draft send out for second round of comments. February-April 2010
9. Final Document Posted and circulated, all materials updated to reflect revision language. May 2010

Full revision of standards will be done every 5 years, allowing for emergency standards revision option, and minor standards revision options as needed.

In 1999, disappointed that the U.S. National Organic Program's standards did not address the people involved in organic agriculture, Michael Sligh of the Rural Advancement Foundation International (RAFI - USA), Richard Mandelbaum of Comité de Apoyo a los Trabajadores Agrícolas/Farmworker Support Committee (CATA), and Elizabeth Henderson of Peacework Organic Farm began a stakeholder process to develop standards for the fair and just treatment of the people involved in organic and sustainable agriculture.

While their experience was in North America, they set out to create standards that could be adapted for use anywhere in the world. They began with a review of existing social standards and then assembled a first draft of what became Toward Social Justice and Economic Equity in the Food System: A Call for Social Stewardship Standards in Sustainable and Organic Agriculture.

They circulated this draft to organic farmers and organic farming associations, non-profits, certification programs, eco-labeling experts, and labor and farm labor organizations. CATA also engaged in an internal process through which the organization's farmworker members provided input to the worker standards. For two years, AJP circulated successive drafts of their standards to stakeholders in the US and abroad and received comments from around the world. To make the document accessible to a wider audience, they arranged for translations into Spanish and French. With each major revision of the document they circulated the new draft to those who had commented on previous drafts, as well as to people new to the project.

In February 2002, the group convened a meeting in Washington, DC that included representatives of several US-based sustainable agriculture non-profits, US-based and international farm labor unions and producer groups, and an international social justice standards initiative. Meeting participants agreed that engaging with the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) should be a high priority. The AJP team committed to designing a pilot project to test the standards and their practicality in the U.S. marketplace. Oscar Mendieta from the Bolivian Association of Organic Producers offered to write a section for the standards document on the rights of indigenous peoples in relation to agricultural production and trade.

Participants at the meeting on social standards convened by the AJP prior to the 2002 IFOAM World Assembly in Victoria, Canada.

Later that year, the AJP facilitated a day and a half-long session on social standards as a prelude to the IFOAM World Assembly in Victoria, Canada. Fifty people from forty countries attended, including members of the IFOAM staff and World Board, and representatives from every continent. The meeting's participants agreed to send a resolution to the IFOAM conference emphasizing the importance of social standards for organic agriculture. They also set ambitious goals for further development of social standards, and for increasing collaboration and discussion among groups around the globe working on these issues.

In the fall of 2003, the AJP convened a three-day stakeholider meeting at the IFOAM Organic Trade Conference in Bangkok, Thailand. The 39 attendees came from all corners of the globe: Africa, Asia, Eastern and Western Europe, Australia, and North and South America. As the meeting proceeded, a clear consensus emerged to advance the social justice agenda in organic agriculture, and to build cooperation between the organic and fair trade movements. Strengthening the voice and participation of indigenous peoples was as an urgent theme.

Participants at the Bangkok meeting visit an organic rice farm as part of a group tour organized by the Green Net Foundation.

Click here to read the full proceedings from the 2003 AJP stakeholder meeting in Bangkok, Thailand.

In early 2005, AJP partnered with the Latin American office of the IUF—International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers' Associations, known in Spanish as UITA—to convene a stakeholder meeting in Montevideo, Uruguay. The meeting was attended by a diversity of farmers and farmers' cooperatives, representatives of indigenous agricultural communities from Bolivia, agricultural workers' unions, and NGOs from around the Americas, including Uruguay, Brazil, Bolivia, Columbia, Mexico, and the United States. During the meeting, participants reviewed and commented on AJP standards, built consensus between farmworkers and small-scale producers, and developed strategies to advance the social agenda in organic and sustainable agriculture.

In the fall of 2005, the Agricultural Justice Project team convened its most recent international stakeholder meeting in Adelaide, Australia, once again prior to the IFOAM World Congress. Twenty-seven people from six continents attended, representing consumers, fair trade importers, farmers, farmworkers, and certifiers. The all-day meeting included presentations by AJP, the Soil Association of the U.K., and JOAA, the Japanese Organic Agriculture Association. Participants had in-depth discussions on standards, IFOAM's Chapter 8 on Social Justice, and the role of community-based organizations in social certification programs. A consensus statement was also prepared, expressing support of IFOAM's Chapter 8 but also concern about its slow rate of implementation, and urging all member organizations of IFOAM "to integrate social justice into their work."

The current version of the AJP standards, Social Stewardship Standards for Organic and Sustainable Agriculture, remains a living document that will be revised and expanded based on the outcomes of the U.S. pilot project and continued stakeholder input.